PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR ANTARA METODE THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN METODE CERAMAH PADA SISWA KELAS X SMK PGRI 1 JAKARTA

SAPARINI AGUSTIANI, NENENG (2015) PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR ANTARA METODE THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN METODE CERAMAH PADA SISWA KELAS X SMK PGRI 1 JAKARTA. S1 thesis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

[img]
Preview
Text
Cover.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Table_Of_Content.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter 1.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img] Text
Chapter 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (0B)
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter 3.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img] Text
Chapter 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (0B)
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter 5.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Bibiliography.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview

Abstract

NENENG SAPARINI AGUSTIANI. The Difference Of Learning Outcomes Between Think Pair Share Method with Lecture Method At Student Tenth Grade In Vocational High School PGRI 1 Jakarta. 2015. This study aims to see the differences of learning outcomes between students who used think pair share method with Lecture method at student tenth grade in Vocational High School PGRI 1 Jakarta. This study used a quasi-experimental method with a quantitative approach. The study design used was Randomized matched subject posttest only Design. Data collection techniques using post-test form. While the data analysis techniques used are requirements analysis test (test for normality and homogenity test) and hypothesis test (t-test). Sample research using the experimental class is X AK1 with the think pair share method and the control class is X AK2 with lecture method. Normality test results of X AK1 indicate that Lo = 0.0870 and Lt = 0.1477. While the class X AK2 are Lt=0.1020 and Lo = 0.1477. So, both the data expressed in normal distribution. For the homogenity test, the F value = 1.06 and F table = 1.69. Homogeneous so that the data stated. In the calculation of the t-test (hypothesis test) result t-value=2,88 bigger than t-table = 2,00 with a significance level of 0.05, so the data is said to be significant, which means there are differences in learning outcomes between think pair share method with lecture method show up by quarrel avarege value in learning outcomes in the amount of 9,52.

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Additional Information: Pembimbing I:Santi Susanti, S.Pd., M. Ak Pembimbing II:Achmad Fauzi, S.Pd., M. Ak
Subjects: Ilmu Sosial (Social Science)
Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Pendidikan (Education)
Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Pendidikan (Education) > Pendidikan Sekolah Lanjutan (Secondary Education)
Divisions: Fakultas Ekonomi > S1 Pendidikan Akuntansi
Depositing User: Ahmad Afandi
Date Deposited: 22 Dec 2017 02:49
Last Modified: 22 Dec 2017 02:49
URI: http://repository.fe.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/1689

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item