ANALISIS DISKRESI KEBIJAKAN FISKAL PADA KEUANGAN NEGARA PEMERINTAH PUSAT PERIODE 1990-2013

BRILIANTI, IZZATI NURIMA (2015) ANALISIS DISKRESI KEBIJAKAN FISKAL PADA KEUANGAN NEGARA PEMERINTAH PUSAT PERIODE 1990-2013. S1 thesis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

[img]
Preview
Text
Cover.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Table_Of_Content.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter1.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img] Text
Chapter2.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (0B)
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter3.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img] Text
Chapter4.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (0B)
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter5.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Bibliography.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview

Abstract

ABSTRACT IZZATI NURIMA BRILIANTI. Analysis Discretionary Fiscal Policy Of State Finances Central Government On Period 1990-2013. Faculty of Economics, State University of Jakarta. 2015. This study aims to determine the level of discretionary revenue items and / or central government spending period of 1990 - 2013. This study used ex post facto. The type of data used by the researchers are secondary data obtained from the literature Bank of Indonesia (BI). The data used is in the form of time series. Data analysis technique used is the average difference test and hypotheses test is chi square test. Based on the results of data analysis found that: 1) on the post acceptance period 1990 to 1998 the central government's discretion doesn’t occur between actual and budget plan with a value of 0.385 and the value ᵡ² t tabel (0:05; 1) of 3.84 can be said tcount (0.385) < ttable (3.84) with a significance level of 0.535> 0.05. 2) The central government revenue items 1999-2013 period occurred between actual and planned discretionary budget to the value of 15.384 and value ᵡ² ttabel (0:05; 4) of 3.84 can be said t count (15.384) > t table (9.49) with 0,000 significance level of <0.05. 3) in the post 1990-1998 period central government spending does not happen discretion between actual and budget plan with a value of 0.632 and the value ᵡ² t tabel (0:05; 1) of 3.84 can be said tcount (0.632) <ttable (3.84) with a significance level of 0.959> 0.05. 4) the central government expenditure 1999-2013 period occurred discretion between actual and budget plan with a value of 12.195 and value ᵡ² ttabel (0:05; 4) of 3.84 can be said tcount (12.195)> t table (9.49) with 0.016 significance level of < 0.05. The conclusion is happening high level of discretionary revenue items and the central government expenditure in the same period ie 1999-2013, which means the accepted hypotheses.

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Additional Information: Pembimbing I: Dr. Harya Kuncara W, SE, M.Si ., Pembimbing II: Karuniana Dianta A.S, S.IP, M.E
Subjects: Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Ilmu Ekonomi (Economics)
Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Administrasi Negera dan Ilmu Kemiliteran (Public Administration & Military Science) > Administrasi Negara (Public Administration)
Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Perdagangan, Komunikasi, Transportasi (Commerce, Communications, Transportation) > Perdagangan Internasional (International Commerce, Foreign Trade)
Divisions: Fakultas Ekonomi > S1 Pendidikan Ekonomi Koperasi
Depositing User: Budi Siswanto
Date Deposited: 27 Dec 2017 08:05
Last Modified: 27 Dec 2017 10:20
URI: http://repository.fe.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/1838

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item