NURJANAH, ANNISA (2013) PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR EKONOMI ANTARA KELOMPOK YANG MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN KONSTRUKTIVISME DENGAN KELOMPOK YANG MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN KONVENSIONAL (STUDI EKSPERIMEN PADA SISWA KELAS X SMA PERGURUAN KSATRIA JAKARTA PUSAT). S1 thesis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
|
Text
Cover.pdf Download (259kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Table_Of_Content.pdf Download (110kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Chapter1.pdf Download (63kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://repository.fe.unj.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (96kB) |
|
|
Text
Chapter3.pdf Download (141kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (126kB) |
|
|
Text
Chapter5.pdf Download (363kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Bibliography.pdf Download (298kB) | Preview |
Abstract
ABSTRAK ANNISA NURJANAH. Difference between Constructivisme Model with Conventional Model in Economic learning outcmes in students of tenth class SMA Perguruan Ksatria Jakarta. 2013 This study aims to determine the differences in economic learning outcomes between group who were using constructivisme model with group who were using Conventinal Model. The population in this study were all students tenth class Perguruan Ksatria Jakarta which consisted of five classes. Sample were taken two classes (60 people) at random, in this case as the experimental group is X2 and the control group is X4. This type of research is experimental research and the types of instruments used im the form of test of cognitive learning outcomes. The results obtained by the average value of 65,9 at the post test in experimental group and control group is 56,87. The highest score of experimental group is 87 and control group is 80. Where as the lowest score of experimental group is 40 and control groups is 38. The results of normality Lcalculate= 0, 104< Ltabel = 0.161, and then Ho is accepted at the 0,05 significance level so the data is normally distributed. Where as the control group test for normality Lcalculate = 0,149 < Ltabel = 0,161 then Ho is accepted at the 0,05 level. So the data are normally distributed. The result of homogeneity test of the experimental group and the control group Fcalculate =1,143 < Ftabel = 1,84 then Ftabel Ho receivedthe 0,05 significance level, so the variance is homogeneous. Hypothesis testing is done through one-way ANNOVA test and obtained Fcalculated = 8,72>Ftabel = 4,01 at 0,05 significance level and the db 1/58 so Ho rejected. This means that there are differences significant in economic learning outcomes between the group who were using the Constructivisme model with group who were using the Conventional model. After that tDunnet test obtained tcalculate = 3,06 > t tabel = 1,67 for a = 0,05 dan db = 1/58 so Ho is rejected. This meansthat economic learning outcomes in group who were using the contructivisme model is more high than group who were using Conventional Model. Keyword: economic outcomes learning, Constructivisme model, Conventional Model
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Pembimbing I: Ari Saptono, SE, M.Pd ., Pembimbing II: Dr. Saparuddin, SE, M.Si |
| Subjects: | Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Ilmu Ekonomi (Economics) Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Pendidikan (Education) Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Pendidikan (Education) > Pendidikan Sekolah Lanjutan (Secondary Education) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Ekonomi > S1 Pendidikan Ekonomi |
| Depositing User: | Budi Siswanto |
| Date Deposited: | 04 Jan 2018 07:00 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Jan 2018 07:00 |
| URI: | http://repository.fe.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/2103 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
