PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE MIND MAPPING DAN METODE KONVENSIONAL PADA MATERI DAFTAR PERJALANAN BISNIS SMK NEGERI 50 JAKARTA TIMUR

LAMSARI, LAMSARI (2014) PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE MIND MAPPING DAN METODE KONVENSIONAL PADA MATERI DAFTAR PERJALANAN BISNIS SMK NEGERI 50 JAKARTA TIMUR. S1 thesis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

	Text Cover.pdf Download (172kB)
	Text Table_Of_Content.pdf Download (18kB)
	Text Chapter1.pdf Download (27kB)
	Text Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (89kB)
	Text Chapter3.pdf Download (263kB)
	Text Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (64kB)
	Text Chapter5.pdf Download (12kB)
	Text Bibliography.pdf Download (13kB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT LAMSARI. The Difference Learning by Using Method Mind Mapping and Conventional Methodin theMatter to Process Business Travel State Vocational School 50 East Jakarta. Faculty of Economics.State University of Jakarta. 2014. This research aims to explain the differences between result that children's learning lessons are given by the method mind mapping conventional method in the matter with my business travel Government Vocational High School50 East Jakarta. This Research using the design or shaped nonequivalent groups fork (filesystem) treatment posttest only design, with the method quantitative. Category or experiment with the approach causality relation comparative. The population all students SMK N 50 Jakarta. The population at affordable prices as much as 80 students. Samples taking as many as 65 students of the table for level Isaac Michael error 5% chosen by random namely 32 samples to XI AP 2 (class experiment) and as many as 33 samples to XI AP 1 (control classes). Data needed to calculate the results study is item test to measure domain knowledge (cognitive) and report my business travel to measure venues skills (impact) students. After being given preferential treatmentas many as 2 weeks of meeting, while price class experiment as much as 65,02 and control classes 62,57. Conclusion t count 0.285and t on a 5 percent for the security council63 was 2.0 known 0.285< 2,000, t count table < t tables , H o received and H rejected that conclusion, that there is no difference between student performance significantly by using this method Mind Mapping andConventionalmethod. Keywords:Learning Outcomes, Mind Mapping Method, Conventional Method

Actions (login required)

View Item