PENGARUH MOTIVASI KERJA DAN PELATIHAN TERHADAP KINERJA PADA KARYAWAN PT. KARISMA BANUA INDONESIA

KASYATI, PUTRI (2014) PENGARUH MOTIVASI KERJA DAN PELATIHAN TERHADAP KINERJA PADA KARYAWAN PT. KARISMA BANUA INDONESIA. S1 thesis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

	Text Cover.pdf Download (425kB)
	Text Table_Of_Content.pdf Download (99kB)
	Text Chapter1.pdf Download (178kB)
	Text Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (394kB)
	Text Chapter3.pdf Download (222kB)
	Text Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (377kB)
	Text Chapter5.pdf Download (90kB)
	Text Bibliography.pdf Download (233kB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT PUTRI KASYATI. The Influence Of Work To Motivation And Training By Performace Of Employees At PT. Karisma Banua Indonesia. Thesis , Jakarta: Concentration of Education Administration Office, Economic Studies Program, Department of Economics and Administration, Faculty of Economic , State University of Jakarta. This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship between work motivation and training on the performance of the employees of PT . Karisma Banua Indonesia. The method used was a survey method with the correlational approach . The study population was all employees of PT production . Karisma Banua Indonesia 76 people . Sampling technique with proportional random technique ( proportional random sampling ) . The samples used were 62 employees by 5 % error level . For variable data work motivation ( X1 ) obtained through questionnaires shaped instruments , training ( X2 ) and performance ( Y ) is obtained through the company's data . Before use, be tested construct validity (construct validity) through the validation process of calculating the correlation coefficient score points with the total score and reliability tests with Cronbach alpha formula . X1 instrument reliability results ( work motivation ) of 0.922 . Analysis using SPSS program begins with the analysis of test requirements for the test methods Komolgrov Smirnov normality and can value X1 , X2 , and Y is 0,200 of which are more than 0.05 then the data were normally distributed . Linearity test can be seen from the output of Linearity Test at the 0.05 significance level . Linearity test results X1 ( Work Motivation ) with Y ( Performance ) of 0.213 , which means more than the 0.05 it can be concluded that the data X1 with Y have a linear effect . Then the results of the linearity test X2 (Training ) with Y (Performance ) of 0.704 which is more than 0.05 then the data can be inferred bahawa X2 with Y has a linear effect . Obtained regression equation is Y = 8.309+ 0.495 X1 + 0.263 X2 . Test the hypothesis that the F test in the ANOVA table produced Fcount ( 22.809 ) > F (3.15), this means that X1 ( Work Motivation ) and X2 ( Training ) together have the effect of Y ( Performance ) . T ¬ t test result count of X1 ( Work Motivation ) of 4.959 and a t of X2 (Training ) at 3,070 and 1,671 ttable because t is greater than t table it can be concluded that there is a positive influence between work motivation and performance training with performance . Then the coefficient of determination obtained test results of 43.6 % , which means that the variable Y ( Performance ) is determined by X1 ( Work Motivation ) and X2 ( Training ) simultaneously to 43.6 % . The conclusion of this study is that there is a positive and significant influence between work motivation and performance training with the performance of the employees of PT . Karisma Banua Indonesia.

Actions (login required)

View Item