PENGARUH MOTIVASI DAN LINGKUNGAN KERJA FISIK TERHADAP KEPUASAN KERJA PADA KARYAWAN PT SAMUDRA TEKNINDO HYDRAUMATIC JAKARTA

CITRA, CITA (2016) PENGARUH MOTIVASI DAN LINGKUNGAN KERJA FISIK TERHADAP KEPUASAN KERJA PADA KARYAWAN PT SAMUDRA TEKNINDO HYDRAUMATIC JAKARTA. S1 thesis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Preview	Text Cover.pdf Download (888kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Table_Of_Content.pdf Download (102kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Chapter1.pdf Download (212kB) | Preview
	Text Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (286kB)
Preview	Text Chapter3.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview
	Text Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (455kB)
Preview	Text Chapter5.pdf Download (150kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Bibliography.pdf Download (67kB) | Preview

Abstract

ABSTRACT CITA CITRA. 8105123263. The Influence Of Motivation and Physical Work Environment on Job Satisfaction in Employee at PT Samudra Teknindo Hydraumatic Jakarta. Thesis. Jakarta: Economic Education Study Program, Faculty of Economics, State University of Jakarta. 2016. This study aimed to determine whether there is influence motivation and physical work environment on job satisfaction in employees at PT Samudra Teknindo Hydraumatic, which is located at Jalan Prof. Latumenten Hasbilan III No.35 Jakarta Barat 11330. This study was conducted over three months from April to June 2016. The research method used is survey method with the correlational approach. The population in this study were all employees at PT Samudra Teknindo Hydraumatic totaling 157 employees. Population affordability are all employees of Plant divisions totaling 89 employees. The sample used in this study amounted to 72 employees by using simple random sampling. Variable data Y (job satisfaction), X1 (motivation), and X (physical work environment) are taken from the questionnaires using likert scale. Prior to use, do test the validity and reliability test with Alpha Cronbach. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 begins with finding test requirements analysis is the normality test using methods Komolgrov Smirnov Z and Y can be the value of 0.657, X21 and X amounted to 0.342 by 0.861 of which were greater than 0.05 then the normal distribution of data. Then look for a test the classical assumption of multicollinearity and heteroscedasticity test. From the test results multikolinearitas Tolerance value amounted to 0.852 greater than 0.1 and less than 10 VIF is 1.174, it can be concluded that there was no trouble multikolinearitas. Furthermore heteroscedasticity test with Spearman's rho test, which resulted in significant value X1 and X 0.285 0.998. Because the significance value greater than 0.05 then there is no problem heteroscedasticity. The regression equation obtained was Y = 52.229 + 0,587X21 + 0,023X. Test the hypothesis that the F test in the ANOVA table known F hitung 2 16.299 > Ftabel 2 3.13. Test t produces t of motivation 5.155 > 1.995 ttabel and t of the physical work environment of 0.281 = t Tabel hitung 1.995. Then test the coefficient of determination obtained results of the remaining 32.1% 67.9% influenced by other factors not examined. It is concluded that there is positive and significant correlation between motivation and job satisfaction. Physical work environment is not significant effect on job satisfaction.

Actions (login required)

View Item