PENERAPAN PENGEMBANGAN TEORI TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP INTENSI MAHASISWA DI JAKARTA UNTUK MENGGUNAKAN TABLET

Nugroho, Hadi (2016) PENERAPAN PENGEMBANGAN TEORI TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP INTENSI MAHASISWA DI JAKARTA UNTUK MENGGUNAKAN TABLET. S1 thesis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

[img]
Preview
Text
Cover.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Table_Of_Content.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter_1.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img] Text
Chapter_2.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (0B) | Request a copy
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter_3.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img] Text
Chapter_4.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (0B) | Request a copy
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter_5.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Bibliography.pdf

Download (0B) | Preview

Abstract

HADI NUGROHO, APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) to the intention STUDENTS AND MOTIVATION FOR USING TABLET IN JAKARTA, Thesis, Jakarta: Education Program Rules of Commerce, Department of Economics and Administration, Faculty of Economics, State University of Jakarta, in June 2016. This study aims to test the research model that builds on the existing theories, with consideration of whether the proposed model can be applied / implemented in subsequent studies. The number of samples in this study was 202 respondents. Then the sampling technique used was purposive sampling techniques and data collection techniques with 6 Likert scale scores / points. Data were analyzed using SPSS v23 exploratory and confirmatory analysis using Amos v22 factors. Four of the five proposed hypothesis is accepted and the rest is rejected, rejected, which means H2 concluded that students in Jakarta after having perceived ease of positive indirect impact on attitudes possitif anyway, but affects the perception of the benefits first and have an impact on the attitude of the peggunaan. And following the results of the hypothesis, H1 has a critical ratio value of 5.533 which means that the hypothesis is accepted. H2 was rejected because the score critical ratio -, 371 means <1.96. Furthermore, the H3 has a critical ratio value of 1.965 which means that the hypothesis is accepted. H4 then received a score of 2.070 and H5 critical ratio received a score of 2,142 is> 1.96.

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Additional Information: Pembimbing I :Usep Suhud, Ph.D Pembimbing II:Rohcyati, M.Pd.
Subjects: Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Pendidikan (Education) > Institusi Pendidikan dan Aktivitasnya (Educational Institutions & Activities)
Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Pendidikan (Education) > Pendidikan Tinggi (Haiger Education)
Teknologi dan Ilmu-Ilmu Terapan (Technology and Applied Science) > Teknologi Pendidikan (Education of Technologi and Applied)
Divisions: Fakultas Ekonomi > S1 Pendidikan Tata Niaga
Depositing User: Helda Romauli Siregar
Date Deposited: 04 Dec 2017 01:48
Last Modified: 04 Dec 2017 01:48
URI: http://repository.fe.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/1027

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item