PENGARUH BIMBINGAN BELAJAR DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR PADA MATAPELAJARAN EKONOMI SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 88 JAKARTA

PURBATI, TIWI AULIA (2014) PENGARUH BIMBINGAN BELAJAR DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR PADA MATAPELAJARAN EKONOMI SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 88 JAKARTA. S1 thesis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Preview	Text Cover.pdf Download (247kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Table_Of_Content.pdf Download (23kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Chapter1.pdf Download (84kB) | Preview
	Text Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (122kB)
Preview	Text Chapter3.pdf Download (117kB) | Preview
	Text Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (173kB)
Preview	Text Chapter5.pdf Download (57kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Bibliography.pdf Download (54kB) | Preview

Abstract

ABSTRACT TIWI AULIA PURBATI, The Effect Tutoring and Learning Against Learning Achievement Motivation In Economics Lesson Implementation Class X SMAN 88 Jakarta . Thesis , Jakarta : Concentration of Economic Education Cooperative, Economic Studies Program, Department of Economics and Administration, Faculty of Economics, State University of Jakarta, 2014. This study aims to obtain valid data and facts, and trustworthy (reliable ) on Influence Tutoring and Learning Against Learning Achievement Motivation In Economics Lesson Implementation Class X SMAN 88 Jakarta This research was conducted by the method of factorial experiments . The population in this study all students of SMAN 88 Jakarta , amounting to 631 students, samples used were as many as 74 students. The sampling technique used is by using a random sampling technique . The instruments used in economic learning achievement of students is obtained from the value of report cards semester academic year 2012/2013 and for tutoring data is secondary data obtained from the field of student affairs vice principal , the students who take the tutoring outside of school, while the instrument for learning motivation in the form of questionnaire with 29 statements. From the test requirements of the study, in the know that the sample originated because of t greater than t table and column Sig homogeneity test is 0.822 greater than 0.05, so H0 is accepted, in other words that the samples come from a homogeneous population. From this research note : There is a difference in students who take the course and did not learn to follow the guidance of academic achievement in high school Economics N 88 Jakarta, Proven Fhitung < Ftable at a = 0.05 or 22.69 > 3.98, there is a difference in student have a high learning motivation and low learning motivation coined the learning achievements of Economics in SMAN 88 Jakarta , Proven Fhitung < Ftable at a = 0.05 or 9.45 > 3.98, there is interaction between tutoring and motivation on learning achievement in Economics SMAN 88 Jakarta, Proven Fhitung < Ftable at a = 0.05 or 25.37 > 3.98, there is a difference in learning achievement between students who take Economics tutoring and do not follow the guidance of learning for students who have high motivation, Proven Fhitung < F table at a = 0.05 or 10.64 > 3.13, there is no difference in learning achievement between students who take Economics tutoring and do not follow the guidance of learning for students who have low motivation, Proven Fhitung < F table at a = 0.05 or 0.034 < 3.13

Actions (login required)

View Item