PENGARUH METODE DISKUSI TERHADAP CRITICAL THINKING SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN PAJAK DI SMKN 14 JAKARTA

Fatmawati, Fatmawati (2013) PENGARUH METODE DISKUSI TERHADAP CRITICAL THINKING SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN PAJAK DI SMKN 14 JAKARTA. S1 thesis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Preview	Text Cover.pdf Download (708kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Table_Of_Content.pdf Download (195kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Chapter 1.pdf Download (329kB) | Preview
	Text Chapter 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (446kB)
Preview	Text Chapter 3.pdf Download (654kB) | Preview
	Text Chapter 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (595kB)
Preview	Text Chapter 5.pdf Download (192kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Bibiliography.pdf Download (108kB) | Preview

Abstract

Fatmawati. This research axamines The Influences Of Discussion Method Againist Critical Thinking Student On Taxation Subject (Study In State Of Vocational School 14 Jakarta). Skripsi, Jakarta: Economics Education Studies Program, Concentration In Accounting Education, Department Of Economics And Administration, Faculty Of Economics, State University Of Jakarta. Juni 2013. This study aimed to find out whether there is a the influences of discussion method againist critical thinking student on taxation subject (study in state of vocational school 14 jakarta) This study aims to determine whether there is the influences of discussion method againist critical thinking student on taxation subject (study in state of vocational school 14 jakarta). The research method used experimental method using a static group comparison. The sampling technique used purposive sampling technique. The research samples are 64 students and based on the table determining the number of samples, they are only 55 students. With a composition of 27 students of class X I Accounting 2, which uses discussion method and 28 students of class XI Accounting 3, which uses lecture variatif. Data obtained using an instrument is a form of questionnaire with likert scale for the variable (Critical Thinking). Where the variable X of 43 statements that have been calibrated validity, a valid statement as many as 36 items are valid and 7 items are drop. Then reliability process using Cronbach alpha formula. The results of the X variable reliability of 0.93. This proves that the instrument is valid and reliable. The data analysis technique used is the test of the difference between two average (t-test). Test data requirements done liliefors normality test data, test data homogeneity of test F. The results of the normality of the data for the variable X , generating Lvalue (Lo) of 0.158667 compared to Ltable (Lt) at the 0.05 significance level by the number of 27 samples is 0.170511, then the Lo < Lt. It means that the data were normally distributed variable X 1 1 . While normality test data for variable X , produces Lvalue (Lo) of 0.1476 compared to Ltable (Lt) at the 0.05 level by the number of 26 samples is 0.16743, then the Lo < Lt. It means that the data were normally distributed variable X . The results of homogeneity test data is Ftables 1.91 and Fvalue is 1,04. So 2 Fvalue < F table. It means that both the data have a homogeneous variance. Then test the difference between two average count obtained T-value 5.08 and T-Table is 1.67 then T-value > T-Table. The results of these calculations can provide the conclusions of this study that there is a difference in critical thinking between students who uses the discussion method and using lecturer variatif.

Actions (login required)

View Item