SOVIARINI, SOVIARINI (2018) PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN DAN BENTUK TES TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI KELAS XI IIS MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI 18 JAKARTA. S1 thesis, Fakultas Ekonomi.
|
Text
Cover.pdf Download (101kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Table_Of_Content.pdf Download (90kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Chapter1.pdf Download (211kB) | Preview |
|
Text
Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (388kB) |
||
|
Text
Chapter3.pdf Download (399kB) | Preview |
|
Text
Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (587kB) |
||
|
Text
Chapter5.pdf Download (158kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Bibliography.pdf Download (232kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Soviarini . 8105141491 . The Influence of Learning Methods and Forms of Tests on Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Economics Subjects in Class XI IIS Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 18 Jakarta . Thesis . Jakarta: Economic Education Study Program. Faculty of Economics State University of Jakarta. 2018. Research this aim for knowing is there the influence of learning methods , and the form of tests on students' critical thinking skills in the eye lesson economy class XI IIS MAN 18 Jakarta. Method research this use method experiment . Population inresearch this is students majors IIS class XI which amountedto 77 students. Technique taking sample w ith technique saturated sampling. Technique using SPSS 20.0 started with looking for test requirements analysis that is test normality and homogeneity , then test anava 2 lane , test the hypothesis that dunnett t test. Results research show Flood wa 1) Anova test results with sig. 0,003 < 0,05 the difference between learning method, 2) sig value. of 0.029 < 0.05 the difference between the test form 3) subsequent test interaction value sig. of 0.000 < 0.05 the interaction between learning methods and test forms. 4) t-Dunnett advanced test t count 10.53 > t table 1.67 there are differences in the problem solving and conventional essay test forms, 5) t-Dunnett further test t count 2.80> t table 1.67 there are differences multiple choice test form on problem solving and conventional class, 6) t-Dunnett test then count 7.3> t table 1.67 there are differences in problem solving methods in the form of essay and multiple choice tests, 7) t-Dunnet t test results count 5.95> t table 1.67 there are differences in conventional methods in the form of essays and multiple choice tests. Keywords : Problem Solving Method ,Conventional Method, Essay Test, Multiple Choice Test Economics Subject
Item Type: | Thesis (S1) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Pembimbing I : Dr. Ari Saptono, SE, M.Pd ; Pembimbing II: Suparno, S.Pd, M.Pd |
Subjects: | Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Ilmu Ekonomi (Economics) Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Pendidikan (Education) Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Pendidikan (Education) > Pendidikan Sekolah Lanjutan (Secondary Education) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Ekonomi > S1 Pendidikan Ekonomi |
Depositing User: | Budi Siswanto |
Date Deposited: | 30 Aug 2018 06:31 |
Last Modified: | 30 Aug 2018 06:31 |
URI: | http://repository.fe.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/5951 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |