PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN DAN BENTUK TES TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI KELAS XI IIS MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI 18 JAKARTA

SOVIARINI, SOVIARINI (2018) PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN DAN BENTUK TES TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI KELAS XI IIS MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI 18 JAKARTA. S1 thesis, Fakultas Ekonomi.

[img]
Preview
Text
Cover.pdf

Download (101kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Table_Of_Content.pdf

Download (90kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter1.pdf

Download (211kB) | Preview
[img] Text
Chapter2.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (388kB)
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter3.pdf

Download (399kB) | Preview
[img] Text
Chapter4.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (587kB)
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter5.pdf

Download (158kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Bibliography.pdf

Download (232kB) | Preview

Abstract

Soviarini . 8105141491 . The Influence of Learning Methods and Forms of Tests on Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Economics Subjects in Class XI IIS Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 18 Jakarta . Thesis . Jakarta: Economic Education Study Program. Faculty of Economics State University of Jakarta. 2018. Research this aim for knowing is there the influence of learning methods , and the form of tests on students' critical thinking skills in the eye lesson economy class XI IIS MAN 18 Jakarta. Method research this use method experiment . Population inresearch this is students majors IIS class XI which amountedto 77 students. Technique taking sample w ith technique saturated sampling. Technique using SPSS 20.0 started with looking for test requirements analysis that is test normality and homogeneity , then test anava 2 lane , test the hypothesis that dunnett t test. Results research show Flood wa 1) Anova test results with sig. 0,003 < 0,05 the difference between learning method, 2) sig value. of 0.029 < 0.05 the difference between the test form 3) subsequent test interaction value sig. of 0.000 < 0.05 the interaction between learning methods and test forms. 4) t-Dunnett advanced test t count 10.53 > t table 1.67 there are differences in the problem solving and conventional essay test forms, 5) t-Dunnett further test t count 2.80> t table 1.67 there are differences multiple choice test form on problem solving and conventional class, 6) t-Dunnett test then count 7.3> t table 1.67 there are differences in problem solving methods in the form of essay and multiple choice tests, 7) t-Dunnet t test results count 5.95> t table 1.67 there are differences in conventional methods in the form of essays and multiple choice tests. Keywords : Problem Solving Method ,Conventional Method, Essay Test, Multiple Choice Test Economics Subject

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Additional Information: Pembimbing I : Dr. Ari Saptono, SE, M.Pd ; Pembimbing II: Suparno, S.Pd, M.Pd
Subjects: Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Ilmu Ekonomi (Economics)
Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Pendidikan (Education)
Ilmu Sosial (Social Science) > Pendidikan (Education) > Pendidikan Sekolah Lanjutan (Secondary Education)
Divisions: Fakultas Ekonomi > S1 Pendidikan Ekonomi Koperasi
Depositing User: Budi Siswanto
Date Deposited: 30 Aug 2018 06:31
Last Modified: 30 Aug 2018 06:31
URI: http://repository.fe.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/5951

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item